IWXA
About the authorExpertiseGet in touch
University 5.0 · Research article 04

Multi-agent Environment of EduOS Lad

Specialist AI agents support education, research, project work and the management of university processes.

EduOS distributes navigation, tutoring, analysis, critical review, coordination, resource and competence support, and governance among specialised functions. Each agent receives bounded context, defined expectations and rules. People remain accountable for decisions.

A developing research architecture, illustrated by an interactive model, not an institution-wide operational deployment.

EduOS LadSpecialised agents

Navigator

Finds available actions and the next step.

Input
Role, task, status, available routes
Output
Available actions and transition points
Recipient
User or coordinator
  1. 01Event → context → task
  2. 02Select agents and route
  3. 03Review evidence and proposed changes
  4. 04Accountable decision → action → result
§ 01

Specialisation and traceable outputs

  1. 01

    One defined function

    Each agent performs a recognised class of actions.

  2. 02

    Bounded context

    Agents receive the data necessary for a particular task.

  3. 03

    Defined output

    Every output has a known format and recipient.

  4. 04

    Observable history

    Inputs, actions, outputs and transitions can be reviewed.

  5. 05

    Governed rules

    Criteria and permissions are set by the process owner.

§ 02

Five levels of the agent environment

Incoming task context is routed to specialist agents, checked against criteria and passed to an accountable participant.

Incoming context

Structure the task, role, data and constraints.

  • Event
  • Task
  • User role
  • Learning pathway
  • Available data
  • Constraints
  • Access rules
Output
Structured working context
Participants
The person submits the task to the router
§ 03

Eight specialised agent functions

Each agent has bounded inputs and outputs, a recipient and a responsible human reviewer.

Navigator

Finds available actions and the next step.

Required inputs
  • Role
  • Current task
  • Status
  • Available routes
  • Constraints
Results
  • Actions
  • Route explanation
  • Conditions
Recipient
User or coordinator
Related functions
  • Coordinator
  • Governance agent
Human control
The user chooses an action
§ 04

Routing a task between agents

Route choice depends on task type, permissions, goals, risk, data and resource constraints. A parallel route means independent checks before coordination, not a sequential handoff.

Simple

  1. 01Task
  2. 02One agent
  3. 03User

Example: Find useful material for a learning topic.

§ 04 · Example

Agents help a team overcome a project delay

A student team is behind schedule and its interim outputs conflict. Agents analyse the problem and prepare options for the team and authorised decision-makers.

01 · Detect signal

Agent
Analyst
Actions
  • Delays
  • Inconsistent results
  • Uneven contributions
  • Resource availability
Output
Structured situation
§ 05

Context and memory boundaries

An agent receives information necessary for its function under the user's permissions. Historical memory does not automatically confer broader rights.

  1. 01

    User

    • Role
    • Authority
    • Learning pathway
    • Current tasks
    • Available data
  2. 02

    Task

    • Objective
    • Expected outcome
    • Criteria
    • Deadline
    • Constraints
    • Dependencies
  3. 03

    Subject

    • Knowledge
    • Methods
    • Sources
    • Data
    • Terminology
  4. 04

    Process

    • Current stage
    • Participants
    • Statuses
    • Previous decisions
    • Open questions
  5. 05

    Governance

    • Rules
    • Access
    • Required approvals
    • Accountable people
    • Permitted actions

Memory levels

  1. 01

    Session context

    • Information from the current interaction and task.
  2. 02

    Process history

    • Actions and outcomes within a particular process.
  3. 03

    Role profile

    • The participant's authority, functions and access.
  4. 04

    Institutional knowledge

    • Approved rules, methods, materials and structures.

Information permitted to each agent

Required
  • Learning goal
  • Task
  • Verified results
  • Available materials
Optional
  • Explanation preference
  • Previous difficulties
  • Pace
Outside authority
  • Administrative files
  • Other students' data
  • Finances
  • Restricted management documents
Output
Explanation and educational next step
Recipient
Student and lecturer
§ 06

Separate recommendations, approvals and actions

No proposed change becomes an authorised action simply because an AI agent recommends it. The accountable role determines permissions and approves changes.

  1. 01

    Inform

    • Find
    • Structure
    • Explain
    • Show relationships

    Output: Information

    Accountable role: A person chooses the next action

  2. 02

    Recommend

    • Analyse
    • Compare
    • Suggest options
    • Explain grounds

    Output: Recommendation

    Accountable role: A person chooses among options

  3. 03

    Prepare approval

    • Check rules
    • Gather evidence
    • Identify conflicts
    • Build route

    Output: Proposed decision package

    Accountable role: An accountable role approves

  4. 04

    Execute within authority

    • Perform an explicitly permitted action
    • Record outcome
    • Notify participants
    • Update state

    Output: Bounded state change

    Accountable role: Responsible role defines and controls permitted actions

Decision responsibilities

Select study material

  1. 01Proposes: Tutor
  2. 02Checks: Educational criteria
  3. 03Decides: Student
  4. 04Record: Lecturer can review
§ 07

Participant roles and authorised help

Student

Main agents
  • Navigator
  • Tutor
  • Critic
  • Competence agent
Tasks
  • Understand tasks
  • Find material
  • Check work
  • Review competence evidence
Agents for a project
  • Navigator
  • Tutor
  • Competence agent
Inputs
  • Project role
  • Material
  • Action order
Results
  • Criteria
  • Preparation plan
  • Competence links
§ 08

Reviewing the quality of an agent result

Example: an agent proposes changing roles in a project team. Each criterion identifies a distinct question, evidence and reviewer.

Correct function

Output addresses the agent's assigned function.

Review question
Which function produced this result?
Evidence
Function specification and task link
Reviewer
Process owner
§ 09

Governing an agent throughout its lifecycle

Define function

Owner
Process owner
Artifact
Task, users, inputs and outputs
Completion
Limits defined
Next stage
Design authority
§ 10

An energy-saving project with multiple agents

A demonstration project develops a model to reduce energy use in a university building; people review the model and authorise a pilot.

01 · Task arrives

University operations requests a model for reducing building energy use.

Active role
Process owner
§ Conclusions

What makes agent work accountable

  1. 01

    Specialisation

    Each agent has an explicit function and type of output.

  2. 02

    Routing

    EduOS connects specialist agents according to the task's context.

  3. 03

    Bounded context

    Access follows the information and permissions needed for a function.

  4. 04

    Review

    Recommendations pass criteria, critique and accountable approval.

  5. 05

    Provenance

    Inputs, agent actions, recommendations and decisions remain connected.

  6. 06

    Human accountability

    Educational, expert and governance decisions belong to authorised roles.

  7. 07

    Governed lifecycle

    Agents are designed, tested, introduced, observed and revised under explicit rules.

About the model

This is a research architecture developed by Sergey Shatokhin as part of University 5.0 at IWXA. Agent specialisation, task routing, limited context, quality review and human responsibility are connected in one proposed environment.